<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)">I have a simple solution - don't be dependent on the whims of your ISP for mail servers. I'm using Tucows/OpenSRS for my globally accessible (authenticated) SMTP server, which also means I won't be rejected for "relaying" if I connect my laptop to the Internet at some other premises than my own.<br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)"> <br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)">Also, for good measure, I am using this same SMTP server at Gmail, where (policy change in Sep 2014) any newly created "from" address requires you to supply your own SMTP server (a BYOS policy - "bring your own server").<br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)"> <br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)">For a Tucows/OpenSRS reseller, that SMTP server costs $0.50 per month - a negligible cost.<br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)"> <br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)">Regarding MTS, I believe they recently switched from MS Live/Hotmail/Outlook to something else for their mail service offering (@<a href="http://mymts.net">mymts.net</a>).<br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)"> <br></div><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Hartmut W Sager - Tel +1-204-339-8331<br></span><div class="gmail_extra"><div><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></span></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">
</span><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 25 April 2015 at 01:31, Trevor Cordes <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:trevor@tecnopolis.ca" target="_blank">trevor@tecnopolis.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Great, Shaw is playing with email things again :-(<br>
<br>
All of a sudden all emails from my box (on a shaw cable modem) outgoing<br>
(via Shaw's recommended smarthost) were being blocked by Shaw. They<br>
blocked me from 1am to 4:30pm.<br>
<br>
I've been using this setup for 10+ years and never had a problem. They<br>
must have switched to a new email outsource service or something.<br>
<br>
Even funnier, what triggered it seems to be this: I'm trying to help my<br>
customer with Spam problems and the RT ticket he made (and hence email<br>
subject) had the word "Spam" and Shaw barfed it back and started the<br>
blocking without warning:<br>
<br>
=========================<br>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 01:07:55 -0500<br>
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <<a href="mailto:MAILER-DAEMON@tecnopolis.ca">MAILER-DAEMON@tecnopolis.ca</a>><br>
Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details<br>
<br>
The original message was received at Fri, 24 Apr 2015 01:07:54 -0500<br>
from localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]<br>
<br>
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----<br>
<<a href="mailto:customer@mycustomer.com">customer@mycustomer.com</a>><br>
(reason: 552 5.2.0 lWmIYQYgD7S0qlWmJYSEv0 spam rejected)<br>
<br>
----- Transcript of session follows -----<br>
... while talking to <a href="http://shawmail.wp.shawcable.net" target="_blank">shawmail.wp.shawcable.net</a>:<br>
>>> DATA<br>
<<< 552 5.2.0 lWmIYQYgD7S0qlWmJYSEv0 spam rejected<br>
554 5.0.0 Service unavailable<br>
<br>
[...]<br>
Subject: [Tecnopolis #2173] Spam Possible<br>
=========================<br>
<br>
Hahaha. Pathetic. So any email that wants to talk about spam and has<br>
that word in the subject is blocked? What if I want to talk about<br>
viagra or rolex, is that blocked too?<br>
<br>
All subsequent emails for the whole day got a bounce:<br>
<br>
=========================<br>
The original message was received at Fri, 24 Apr 2015 02:54:59 -0500<br>
from localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]<br>
<br>
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----<br>
<<a href="mailto:customer@mycustomer.com">customer@mycustomer.com</a>><br>
(reason: 554 mo23.dcs.int.inet <a href="http://shaw.ca" target="_blank">shaw.ca</a> ESMTP server not available)<br>
<br>
----- Transcript of session follows -----<br>
... while talking to <a href="http://shawmail.wp.shawcable.net" target="_blank">shawmail.wp.shawcable.net</a>:<br>
<<< 554 mo23.dcs.int.inet <a href="http://shaw.ca" target="_blank">shaw.ca</a> ESMTP server not available<br>
554 5.0.0 Service unavailable<br>
=========================<br>
<br>
WTF is mo23.dcs.int.inet? Looks new to me.<br>
<br>
Anyhow, after a call to a clueless tech rep telling me I'm unsupported<br>
because I run sendmail *simply as an outgoing mail MTA pointing directly<br>
to their smart host* and an email to their (hopefully) more advanced<br>
techs, I got nowhere until it magically fixed itself at 4:30. I probably<br>
hit their BL timeout or something.<br>
<br>
I dare anyone on the Shaw network using normal SMTP outgoing to send an<br>
email with the subject of "sp*m" (I dare not spell it out in full, he who<br>
can't be named and all that). Let me know if they block you for a day and<br>
whether you get anywhere with tech support.<br>
<br>
Shame on Shaw. Almost getting as bad as MTS. Wait a minute, no one can<br>
get *that* bad (MS Live mail anyone?). :-)<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Roundtable mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Roundtable@muug.mb.ca">Roundtable@muug.mb.ca</a><br>
<a href="http://www.muug.mb.ca/mailman/listinfo/roundtable" target="_blank">http://www.muug.mb.ca/mailman/listinfo/roundtable</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>